The GUN Forum

Find answers, ask questions, and connect with our
community around the world.

home Forums – The GUN Forum News Combat and War Footage Footage of Russian Lancet loitering munition hitting an Ukrainian truck

  • Footage of Russian Lancet loitering munition hitting an Ukrainian truck

    Posted by floai on August 6, 2022 at 9:04 am


    [embed]https://reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/w57cpq/footage_of_russian_lancet_loitering_munition/[/embed]

    Footage of Russian Lancet loitering munition hitting an Ukrainian truck

    floai replied 1 week, 5 days ago 2 Members · 8 Replies
  • 8 Replies
  • No-Relationship-4778

    Guest
    August 6, 2022 at 9:04 am

    Sorry now for being a ”russian troll” but when we get footage from the russian everyone makes long ass comments trying to discredit it or something. But i dont se alot of the same sort of questions when the ukranians publish something

    I am on the ukrainian side but we should question ukranian footage to.

  • Flawless87

    Guest
    August 6, 2022 at 9:04 am

    For a moment I was confused why the title didn’t say hitting a truck and artillery piece. But then I realized why…the artillery is fine.

  • sprite_sc2

    Guest
    August 6, 2022 at 9:04 am

    Russian footage is so wonderfully suspicious even when they actually achieve something. It seems that:

    1. They failed to hit the side of a truck with their fancy drone (looks like it goes above that bush just in front of the cabin, and hits the tree on the other side)?
    2. At least 3 or 4 dudes made it out of there. (Gotta make that footage so blurry that no-one will ever know).
    3. Why not show the explosion / fire? Did they have to follow-up with standard arty?

    I guess they’re so completely caught up in bullshitting about their superiority that they won’t allow any footage that isn’t absolutely perfect?

  • Brozef_

    Guest
    August 6, 2022 at 9:04 am

    Nice hit

  • Eheran

    Guest
    August 6, 2022 at 9:04 am

    At first I was like: Wow, they didnt cut together different footage to a stupid propaganda video… the locations after a cut were really the same.

    Then I see the drone appear to not-hit the target, as it might have steered away in the last second, just as seen in the last “hit” video ([see here](https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/w2oc9l/russian_kubbla_loitering_munition_strike_in/), also read the discussion as to how/why that might happen). Hence it seems to smash into a tree. Then a massive cut. Everything is destroyed/burned. ~~But the truck is turned~~. So it ~~clearly~~ maybe wasnt destroyed from the drone. Amazing propaganda as always.

    Edit: It didnt turn, the video is from the other side. Still very suspicious.


    Russian KUB-BLA loitering munition strike in Kherson Oblast. from CombatFootage

  • Colinpolin

    Guest
    August 6, 2022 at 9:04 am

    Ukraine circle-jerkers are gonna be upset by this video..

  • Altruistic-Carpet-65

    Guest
    August 6, 2022 at 9:04 am

    Is that a anti-tank gun? It looks awfully skinny.

  • bluecheese2040

    Guest
    August 6, 2022 at 9:04 am

    A Russian drone was shot down towards the start of the war and inside it had a canon camera with a (I think) kit lens that had been glued to the infinity range setting. This sort of optic is NOT designed for detailed…NATO style…images over distance and the lack of ability to shift focus means I’m amazed we ever get clear footage. I mean using consumer cameras with basic lenses will always produce this sort of image when we are talking about huge distances.

    Also, when you lock the focus ring if the drone gets too close the focus will be lost.

    So I suspect that many of the cuts of Russian videos is really about focus and their lack of ability to shift the focus of the camera but instead needing to move the whole drone.

    I could be wrong but alot of Russian video looks like the lens is showing an stuff that’s really too far away for the lens to show clear images.

Reply to: floai
Cancel
Your information:

Start of Discussion
0 of 0 replies June 2018
Now